The Political Compass
Pace News Limited
(Editors Note: I initially incorporated this test in an essay I wrote in 2005 entitled The Great Silver Heist. In my humble opinion, the notions of left and right, as they relate to politics, are no longer viable gauges of any ideological differences (read in: Demopublicans) but rather, have always been contrived distractions intended to divert public attention away from any meaningful understanding of the differences between the ideologies of our founding fathers and those of "the Dark Side". When I hear someone blaming it on the Republicans or the Democrats, I immediately realize that that person has been sufficiently "propagandized" and as a result, tends to completely miss the point. It's not about left and right. It is about Collectivism (total control by the government) and anarchism (individual control of everything relating to one's self) If you have not yet "taken the test", please do so and then re-examine your personal feelings about the last several administrations and their apparent agendae. By the way, if you fancy yourself a Libertarian, it's just as much about everyone else's liberties, as it is yours. Keep that in mind as you "take the test".- JSB)
Welcome to The Political Compass
There's abundant evidence for the need of it. The old one-dimensional categories of 'right' and 'left', established for the seating arrangement of the French National Assembly of 1789, are overly simplistic for today's complex political landscape. For example, who are the 'conservatives' in today's Russia? Are they the unreconstructed Stalinists, or the reformers who have adopted the right-wing views of conservatives like Margaret Thatcher?
On the standard left-right scale, how do you distinguish leftists like Stalin and Gandhi? It's not sufficient to say that Stalin was simply more left than Gandhi. There are fundamental political differences between them that the old categories on their own can't explain. Similarly, we generally describe social reactionaries as 'right-wingers', yet that leaves left-wing reactionaries like Robert Mugabe and Pol Pot off the hook.
That's about as much as we should tell you for now. After you've responded to the following propositions during the next 3-5 minutes, all will be explained. In each instance, you're asked to choose the response that best describes your feeling: Strongly Disagree, Disagree, Agree or Strongly Agree. At the end of the test, you'll be given the compass, with your own special position on it.
The test is entirely anonymous. None of your personal details are required, and nothing about your result is recorded or logged in any way. The answers are only used to calculate your reading, and cannot be accessed by anyone, ever.
The idea was developed by a political journalist with a university counselling background, assisted by a professor of social history. They're indebted to people like Wilhelm Reich and Theodor Adorno for their ground-breaking work in this field. We believe that, in an age of diminishing ideology, a new generation in particular will get a better idea of where they stand politically - and the sort of political company they keep. So are you ready to take the test? Remember that there's no right, wrong or ideal response. It's simply a measure of attitudes and inevitable human contradictions to provide a more integrated definition of where people and parties are really at. Click here to start. If you wish to contact us, email [email protected].