Send this article to a friend:
December
01
2020
|
Send this article to a friend: December |
|
Antartic Strangeness, "Crashed" Satellites, &That...
But the “monolith” isn’t the only strange thing about the story. There’s two versions of this that I want to share, and they’re both… well… odd: Strange metal objects are being found in Western deserts
Let’s take the first story first, before examining the “monolith” story more closely in the second article. In the first story, oddly enough, the “monolith” is apparently not the only strange thing popping up in the southwestern American desert. As the first article makes clear, “wreckage” that looks more like the soft-landing of a satellite was found in Arizona:
OK, so we have (1) a satellite that was (2) perhaps being carried by a balloon (perhaps for testing purposes, as the things that normally carry satellites are rockets), that (3) “crashed” in Arizona, but it really didn’t crash because it was attached to parachutes, which means someone wanted it to land, and (4) that someone may be the “Polar Field Services” corporation, which apparently “released” the satellite-or-whatever-it-is to its employees, and is keeping a tight lip about it. And, oh yes, “Polar Field Services” according to the article is “based in Colorado” and “specializes in providing logistics and support for expeditions to locations in extreme climates,” the type of climate perhaps being suggested in the name of the company itself: Polar Field Services. Now I don’t know about you, but I get the distinct whiff of “Antarctic strangeness” from all this. One could, I suppose, argue that the northern wastes of Canada or Siberia would qualify as locations of “extreme climates” that are “polar,” and one would be correct. But by the same token, if one wants to talk about “polar” conditions where there actually is land at one of the poles, and where conditions are certainly “extreme”, then Antarctica is the only candidate. And that raises a few prickly questions of its own on this porcupine of a story: why would a company providing “logistical” services to “expeditions” in “extreme climates” be testing what looks like a satellite with a balloon, and parachuting said “satellite” into the Arizona desert near the town of Kayenta. (Believe it or not, I’ve been to Kayenta a few times, and I can assure the reader that it’s as “in-the-middle-of-nowhere” as any place can possibly be.) And it appears to be a test, since what was discovered was a “satellite.” It may or may not be a satellite, but assuming it is, why would a company design a satellite with parachutes? On and on we could go, but I think you get the idea. Something rather peculiar is going on in the deserts around Kayenta, Arizona, and in my high octane speculation view, it may have something to do with Antarctica. But wait, there’s more… There’s also that story about the discovery of the “monolith” in Arizona’s neighboring state to the north, Utah. This one is long on vagueness and short on details:
And that, dear readers, is almost the entirety of the article. Needless to say, I have some suspicions here: some folks from the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources are out in a helicopter counting bighorn sheep, when suddenly one of them spots a “metallic thing” – the “monolith” – sticking out of the ground that’s tucked away in “a red rock cove”. They land the helicopter and take photos and videos, but do not disclose the location because they all feared “amateur adventurers might get stuck.” Except I rather suspect that the whole purpose of the “monolith” and whoever put it there is precisely to stoke public curiosity so that more and more people make the trek to find it for themselves. (A little investigation with air traffic control?) In other words, the "monolith" appears to have the same function as the "monolith" in Stanley Kubrik's 2001 A Space Odyssey: it's perhaps an alchemical object designed to provoke curiosity and transformation of consciousness. Funny thing, too, the pictures of its location show red rocky formations, such as one encounters in southern Utah around Zion State Park and eastward, and that means, just north of Arizona, and Kayenta just happens to be in the very northeast of Arizona, in the area of the big state and national parks of southern Utah...the whole area, from southwestern Utah/northwestern Arizona, to the area around Kayenta in northeastern Arizona, has similar landscape. One wonders,then, if in some strange way, these stories might be related. See you on th... oh yea, about the update. Just days after the "monolith" was "discovered," it appears to have been removed by whoever put it there, or, as the article below suggests, was stolen? Either war, a telltale sign, perhaps, that the jig was up and the game was over... ‘Aliens took it back?’ Utah monolith mysteriously DISAPPEARS, possibly stolen at night See you on the flip side...
Born and raised in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and "strange stuff". His book The Giza DeathStar was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into "alternative history and science". Following a paradigm of researching the relationship between alternative history and science, Farrell has followed with a stunning series of books, each conceived to stand alone, but each also conceived in a pre-arranged sequence:
|
Send this article to a friend:
 |
 |
 |
![[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]](http://www.kitconet.com/images/live/s_gold.gif)
![[Most Recent USD from www.kitco.com]](http://www.weblinks247.com/indexes/idx24_usd_en_2.gif)
![[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]](http://www.kitconet.com/images/live/s_silv.gif)