Party On, Wall Street!
What are we to make of Wall Street’s exuberance on Friday over news concerning a U.S. economic expansion that refuses to die? Employers are hiring, consumers are spending and business is humming despite a dramatic economic slowdown in Asia, Europe, South America and elsewhere. Perhaps America really is an economic island, one blessed with unstinting support from a central bank that has finally succeeded in taming the business cycle? If you are too young to remember the last three or four recessions, you might actually believe that things are different this time.
Wall Street Journal columnist David Harrison evidently does. Judging from his picture, Harrison appears to be no older than 30, so we can perhaps forgive him for suggesting, to borrow Prof. Irving Fisher’s immortal declaration, that economic equilibrium appears to have reached a permanently high plateau.In fairness, it must be said that Harrison’s recent think-piece, A Bellwether No Longer Rings True, makes a pretty good statistical case for downgrading manufacturing as an economic harbinger. He notes that although factories have had a tough year marked by falling output, investment and employment, as well as a global tariff war that threatens to drag on indefinitely, the U.S. economy overall seems barely to have flinched. This happy if surprising state of affairs he attributes to manufacturing’s shrinking share of the economy. In its place, a burgeoning services sector has inoculated the U.S. against downturns, balancing out the inventory swings that have long been associated with boom and bust cycles.
Or so the argument goes. But the suspicion nags that the rosy statistics do not yield an accurate picture of the U.S. economy. To be sure, a lot of fat cats have grown their wealth stupendously by holding shares in companies that on the surface seem to be doing amazingly well. And yet, two obvious examples, Facebook and Google, are just glorified advertising agencies. How long will their profits hold up in a global downturn? Another corporate behemoth, Apple, depends largely on the sale of just one very high-margin product: the iPhone, which has saturated the market and faces increasing competition from Asian manufacturers, most notably Huawei.
If these are truly the best of times as the headlines would have us believe, the statistics by which we judge them so are but an inch deep. A bull market currently in its eleventh year colors our thinking more than we might care to imagine, and we are delirious if we believe the global downturn in manufacturing will not eventually impact consumers. Hubris and rising shares prices have kept them borrowing and spending, at least for the time being, but don’t be surprised if the stock market starts to swing more wildly than anyone can recall. Leading pundits will tell us to stay the course, but that in itself could be a timely warning to abandon ship.
Barron’s once labeled Rick Ackerman an “intrepid trader” in a headline that alluded to his key role in solving a notorious pill-tampering case. He received a $200,000 reward when a conviction resulted, and the story was retold on TV’s FBI: The Untold Story. But to the gang at CNBC, he’s been a pariah for the last ten years – a shoot-from-the-hip kinda guy whose irreverent style got him banned from the show after an interview on Squawk Box was alleged to have gone awry.
His professional background includes 12 years as a market maker on the floor of the Pacific Coast Exchange, three as an investigator with renowned San Francisco private eye Hal Lipset, seven as a reporter and newspaper editor, three as a columnist for the Sunday San Francisco Examiner, and two decades as a contributor to publications ranging from Barron’s to The Antiquarian Bookman to Fleet Street Letter and Utne Reader. His detailed strategies for stocks, options, and indexes have appeared since the early 1990s in Black Box Forecasts, a newsletter he founded that originally was geared to professional option traders.
Send this article to a friend: