Send this article to a friend: November |
Our Kind: Why the Democrats Abandoned the Middle Class "Another example of giving the game away in few words came two nights ago when the liberal-elitist 'Inside Elections' political analyst Stuart Rothenburg spoke on the PBS NewsHour. 'The Democrats as a party' Rothenburg told NewsHour host and Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) member Judy Woodruff, 'are divided between the Bernie Sanders wing and Hillary Clinton wing, the pragmatists and ideologues.'If you watch this relatively short video much of what has been puzzling you about the failure of our political system will be made clearer. Franklin Roosevelt could work tirelessly for the common person because he was already comfortable in his own skin with regard to his own social status, and more importantly, as a result of his long term paralysis he knew how little that it really meant. As suffering sometimes does, it introduces compassion and empathy even among the upper crust. But the New Deal principles were shunned for the credentialed aspirations of those class-climbing, middle class kids who would be rich and acknowledged as members of an elite crowd with the right kinds of bona fides. There are probably few better recent examples than the Clintons. Their attitudes towards the average American are paternalistic at best, and highly cynical and patronizing at worst. They attempted to disguise their credentialed, professional class preferences with 'identity politics.' But if you look at the culmination of actual policy initiatives, versus platform platitudes, the Democrats, similarly to the GOP, serve no one but themselves. They rely on the 'lesser of two evils' to scrape out the occasional win, when the excesses of the other party drive people to embrace 'hope and change,' and to be largely betrayed once again.
jessescrossroadscafe.blogspot.com |
Send this article to a friend: