Send this article to a friend:

September
16
2022

The Cleansing Fire
Jeffrey Tucker

“You could call that stagflation.”

Those are the words of the once-revered Ben Bernanke, giving his outlook for the near-term future of the American and world economies. Strange, isn’t it, how the Fed’s ex-chairman tends to be more honest with us than the present one.

After Alan Greenspan left the position, he wrote a pretty good book decrying the whole existence of the fiat money regime, while Bernanke is carefully distancing himself from the policies of the current Fed.

It’s been generations since we last experienced stagflation on this level, and it has never happened in the context of puffed-up tech giants and financialization of the sort that dominates the planet now.

We are very likely to learn a number of things concerning the truth of the economy. This is because the combination of inflation and recession acts as a cleansing fire, revealing awful things that we previously did not want to face.

Simply put, we are now experiencing an economic crisis that could get worse. Inflation is roaring. The recession most of us already sense could soon become official.

What Are You Going to Do About It?

Many voters are looking to their elected representatives to address the problem. What follows are questions that I would like to pose to any and all candidates for office concerning their views on essential issues related to the economic well-being of Americans.

I was prompted to put them together by a primary debate for a U.S. congressional race in Tennessee at which I was a questioner.

1. Every poll shows economic concerns rank very high among the public concerns right now. Congress has some but not all authority over policies that affect people’s lives in this respect. Let’s first address the issue of spending over which Congress has primary control.

Before pandemic lockdowns, federal spending stood at $5 trillion per annum (five times as high as when Ronald Reagan said the budget was out of control and needed to be slashed). This soared over six months by 82% to $9.1 trillion. The total pulled back a bit to $6 trillion before soaring under Biden to $8 trillion. It seems to have settled back to $5.8 trillion but Congress is now being pushed to more spending.

In the course of 2½ years, the federal debt skyrocketed from $23 trillion to $30.5 trillion, or 32.6% in a mere 28 months. The national debt now stands at 125% of GDP.

All of this spending was approved by Congress.

• Do you see this as sustainable?
• What do you believe needs to be done to repair the damage to the balance sheet?
• With Biden as president, what can Congress do in the area of spending?

What About Inflation?

2. Inflation ranks very high among concerns of voters today. The Biden administration has attempted to blame Putin, oil companies, meat-packers and of course the broken supply chains for the problem. He has suggested prosecuting companies for raising prices too highly too quickly. But many economists are pointing to deeper structural problems.

What in your mind bears primary responsibility for the dramatic fall in the purchasing power of the dollar? What if anything can Congress do about it?

3. I would like to address the sufferings of small businesses today. Most estimates are that one-third or more of small businesses closed during the lockdowns and have not come back. Large businesses, particularly tech companies, thrived as never before.

Small-business optimism is at a 48-year low. Is it possible to construct policies that seek some kind of redress? What kinds of things can Congress do to make life easier for small businesses?

4. History bears witness to how both parties were initially supportive of lockdowns that shut business, schools, churches and playgrounds and divided workers into essential and nonessential. There has since been a strange silence among Republicans about this event.

Do you believe that the Republicans in Congress at the time should admit responsibility for this panicked reaction? Are there conditions that you think would warrant governments stepping in to shut businesses and other institutions in the future?

5. The U.S. today faces myriad trade conflicts in the world both concerning imports and exports, as well as outsourcing and foreign investment in the U.S. The U.S. Constitution clearly gives the trade power to Congress, in Article I, Section 8: “Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises.”

Today, the power over trade has been given to the U.S. president. Do you believe that Congress should take it back and what effect do you believe that would have on U.S. international relations in the economic realm?

The Deep State

6. The Supreme Court in the case of EPA 0v. West Virginia sought to curb the power of the administrative state, not just the EPA but the full range of agencies that regulate and effectively make law without legislation. We all know that President Trump sought to curb the role of the administrative state but with limited success.

How can Congress go about taking back the power to make policy from the agencies? If agencies need to be cut or abolished, which would you name as part of that list?

7. Related to the previous question, the problem of the concentration of power in the U.S. economy has presented itself in many forms over the last years, including the role of Big Pharma at the Food and Drug Administration, Big Tech in Department of Homeland Security surveillance and Big Media at the Federal Communications Commission.

It appears to many that these agencies have been captured by the largest players in industry. Do you have opinions on this topic and what Congress can do?

8. This question concerns American energy needs. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen told the Senate that the U.S. needs to transition from oil and coal and instead use the “wind and sun” for energy needs.

Right now, her preferred sources account for perhaps 10% of U.S. energy production, and even achieving that has required vast government subsidies. What is your view on choice in energy, including nuclear, and how U.S. energy policy should proceed?

More Questions

9. Are there any conditions under which you would support tax increases of any form?

10. What is your plan to reduce the size and scope of government, if that is what you desire? What do you hope a new Republican-controlled Congress can achieve, not just in this term but the next too?

11. Many economists have suggested that the Fed is not doing the job it was founded to do. Under Article I, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution, the authority to oversee money was clearly given to Congress, specifying that no state can “make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debt.”

Should Congress curb the power of the Fed and take back its role in managing monetary affairs?

12. Ronald Reagan often emphasized that an enterprising and prosperous society requires limits on government to unleash the creativity of the human spirit. What to your mind is the role of government in a free and prosperous society and how will you use your seat in Congress to promote that?

I could think of a lot more questions, but these are enough for now. If we could only get some answers.

Regards,

Jeffrey Tucker
for The Daily Reckoning

 

 

Jeffrey A. Tucker is Editorial Director for the American Institute for Economic Research.

He is the author of many thousands of articles in the scholarly and popular press and nine books in 5 languages, most recently Liberty or Lockdown. He is also the editor of The Best of Mises. He speaks widely on topics of economics, technology, social philosophy, and culture.

Jeffrey is available for speaking and interviews via his email.  Tw | FB | LinkedIn

 

dailyreckoning.com