Send this article to a friend:

April
16
2021

Federal Reserve Propaganda Hour Fail
JHAnders

It's that time again when CBS's 60 Minutes pretends to do financial journalism by asking coordinated preplanned "hard-hitting questions" to manipulate their mostly aged and elderly tell-a-vision viewers.

We've covered other softball public relations pieces that 60 Minutes has produced on this SD Bullion channel; you might recall seeing a short video we produced in early 2020 entitled, "JPMorgan Silver Crime Charges to NY Fed REPO Loan Ramp." 

Since that was video was published, JPMorgan Chase got off with a slap on the wrist fine by the Department of Justice and CFTC to the tune of less than 1 billion in value for supposedly spoof riggings precious metals prices thousands of instances over more than one-decade timeframe. 

If you missed that 17 minutes expose, you could watch 60 Minutes pretend JP Morgan was not a criminal recidivist megabank operating in broad daylight back in late 2019.

As we often do on these for posterity, time-capsule mockings.

We'll highlight some legit financial journalism provided by WallStreetOnParade.com.

A website owned and run by astute mom and pop Wall Street critics Pam & Russ Martens.

The following is their take on what they witnessed in this past Sunday evening's 60 Minutes CBS & Federal Reserve broadcast shown on April 11, 2021. 

The Wall Street On Parade post was published the day after the 60 Minutes whitewash aired.

It is aptly entitled, "Fed Chair Jerome Powell Goes on 60 Minutes to Present a False Narrative on Mega Banks He Supervises Loaning Out their Balance Sheets to Hedge Funds."

Federal Reserve Propaganda Hour on Overleveraged Unregulated Risks

There it is, in so many stumbling, preapproved fake journalist questions and financial propagandist's words.

Basically, no one is watching over nor regulating these commercial megabanks currently leveraging up and gambling with FDIC-insured demand deposits.

Over half of all unsecured bank deposit accounts in the USA are held with these derivative gambling bank casinos.

So you might seriously consider your counterpart banks of business before the next largest-ever implosion of Wall Street comes about yet again.

6 Mega Banks Which May "Bail You In" | G20 Bank Bail-In Laws


 


 

our mission:

to widen the scope of financial, economic and political information available to the professional investing public.
to skeptically examine and, where necessary, attack the flaccid institution that financial journalism has become.
to liberate oppressed knowledge.
to provide analysis uninhibited by political constraint.
to facilitate information's unending quest for freedom.
our method: pseudonymous speech...
Anonymity is a shield from the tyranny of the majority. it thus exemplifies the purpose behind the bill of rights, and of the first amendment in particular: to protect unpopular individuals from retaliation-- and their ideas from suppression-- at the hand of an intolerant society.

...responsibly used.

The right to remain anonymous may be abused when it shields fraudulent conduct. but political speech by its nature will sometimes have unpalatable consequences, and, in general, our society accords greater weight to the value of free speech than to the dangers of its misuse.

Though often maligned (typically by those frustrated by an inability to engage in ad hominem attacks) anonymous speech has a long and storied history in the united states. used by the likes of mark twain (aka samuel langhorne clemens) to criticize common ignorance, and perhaps most famously by alexander hamilton, james madison and john jay (aka publius) to write the federalist papers, we think ourselves in good company in using one or another nom de plume. particularly in light of an emerging trend against vocalizing public dissent in the united states, we believe in the critical importance of anonymity and its role in dissident speech. like the economist magazine, we also believe that keeping authorship anonymous moves the focus of discussion to the content of speech and away from the speaker- as it should be. we believe not only that you should be comfortable with anonymous speech in such an environment, but that you should be suspicious of any speech that isn't.

 

 

www.zerohedge.com

Send this article to a friend: