Powell Kills March 50bps Rate Hike, But Leave Door Open For Later In 2022
Rest in Peace 50bps March rate hike.
Moments ago, Fed Chair Powell said that he is "inclined to support a 25 basis point rate hike" in March, which immediately killed any market expectation of a 1+ rate hike in two weeks.
However, in the very next sentence, Powell said that if inflation stays hot, he could move more than 25 basis points at upcoming meetings, which in turn pushed the full year rate hike expectations sharply higher, from 5.2 to 5.6.
Of course, this is not the end of this story, and should oil continue to surge - and it will - unleashing inflationary shockwaves and crippling global growth, expect this hawkish consensus to once again unwind... but not yet, because as noted earlier, the VaR shock in the STIR space is now in full-blown reverse mode, with Dec 2022 ED futs collapsing and undoing their entire Tuesday move...
... even though absolutely nothing has changed in the past 24 hours. More remarkably, looking at the Eurodollar strip, today is shaping up as an even bigger hawkish "surprise" reversal than the July 2013 taper tantrum.
Finally, what all of this means is that bond market volatility is exploding, and assuring that the Fed will have to be on its toes as any geopolitical news can spark a liquidation or short-covering frenzy in a bond market where there is now also virtually no liquidity.
to widen the scope of financial, economic and political information available to the professional investing public.
to skeptically examine and, where necessary, attack the flaccid institution that financial journalism has become.
to liberate oppressed knowledge.
to provide analysis uninhibited by political constraint.
to facilitate information's unending quest for freedom.
our method: pseudonymous speech...
Anonymity is a shield from the tyranny of the majority. it thus exemplifies the purpose behind the bill of rights, and of the first amendment in particular: to protect unpopular individuals from retaliation-- and their ideas from suppression-- at the hand of an intolerant society.
The right to remain anonymous may be abused when it shields fraudulent conduct. but political speech by its nature will sometimes have unpalatable consequences, and, in general, our society accords greater weight to the value of free speech than to the dangers of its misuse.
Though often maligned (typically by those frustrated by an inability to engage in ad hominem attacks) anonymous speech has a long and storied history in the united states. used by the likes of mark twain (aka samuel langhorne clemens) to criticize common ignorance, and perhaps most famously by alexander hamilton, james madison and john jay (aka publius) to write the federalist papers, we think ourselves in good company in using one or another nom de plume. particularly in light of an emerging trend against vocalizing public dissent in the united states, we believe in the critical importance of anonymity and its role in dissident speech. like the economist magazine, we also believe that keeping authorship anonymous moves the focus of discussion to the content of speech and away from the speaker- as it should be. we believe not only that you should be comfortable with anonymous speech in such an environment, but that you should be suspicious of any speech that isn't.