"Crypto Is Here To Stay": Carl Icahn Wants Up To $1.5 Billion In Crypto Exposure,
Prefers Ethereum Tyler Durden
With the likes of JPMorgan and Goldman jumping on the crypto train (favoring Ethereum over Bitcoin), yet another one of the world's most legendary investors has became bullish on the space (adding to Loeb, Dalio and Druckenmiller, while Munger and his Omaha homie never will).
On Thursday, Carl Icahn told Bloomberg Markets' Taylor Riggs that while he doesn't own any digital currencies, his firm might get involved in a "relatively big way," adding "Crypto is here to stay in one form or another."
"I think a natural manifestation of this inflation," said Dalio, adding "it's not yet there - but you had it in the 70s, and what's gonna happen if you have that is, [people are] going be for looking for other stores of value outside the dollar. We are the resereve currency now, but if you keep printing money, it's not going to be there."
When asked if he sees crypto as a store of value or more of a payment system, or the 'underlying blockchain' as is the case with Ethereum, Icahn replied:
"With Ethereum it's the underlying block chain. So, Ethereum has two things - you can use it as a payment system, you can use it as a store of value."
"So Ethereum and Bitcoin are different. Bitcoin to me is just a store of value."
It seems the market is thinking the same way the last few months...
When asked by host Caroline Hyde if he was looking at Bitcoin and Ethereum for an investment, Icahn said "I'm looking at the whole business. I'm not looking at what to buy necessarily at this time, I'm just looking at the whole business and how I might get involved in it with Icahn Enterprises, in a relatively big way. Cause I do think it's here to stay in one form or another."
"What does relatively big way mean?" asked Hyde, who then pressed him on the dollar amount he might invest.
"Well, a big way for us would not be to buy a few coins or something," replied Icahn, adding "I mean, a big way for us would be a billion dollars, billion and-a-half dollars ... I'm not going to say exactly."
Notable crypto investor Michael Saylor took notice:
to widen the scope of financial, economic and political information available to the professional investing public.
to skeptically examine and, where necessary, attack the flaccid institution that financial journalism has become.
to liberate oppressed knowledge.
to provide analysis uninhibited by political constraint.
to facilitate information's unending quest for freedom.
our method: pseudonymous speech...
Anonymity is a shield from the tyranny of the majority. it thus exemplifies the purpose behind the bill of rights, and of the first amendment in particular: to protect unpopular individuals from retaliation-- and their ideas from suppression-- at the hand of an intolerant society.
The right to remain anonymous may be abused when it shields fraudulent conduct. but political speech by its nature will sometimes have unpalatable consequences, and, in general, our society accords greater weight to the value of free speech than to the dangers of its misuse.
Though often maligned (typically by those frustrated by an inability to engage in ad hominem attacks) anonymous speech has a long and storied history in the united states. used by the likes of mark twain (aka samuel langhorne clemens) to criticize common ignorance, and perhaps most famously by alexander hamilton, james madison and john jay (aka publius) to write the federalist papers, we think ourselves in good company in using one or another nom de plume. particularly in light of an emerging trend against vocalizing public dissent in the united states, we believe in the critical importance of anonymity and its role in dissident speech. like the economist magazine, we also believe that keeping authorship anonymous moves the focus of discussion to the content of speech and away from the speaker- as it should be. we believe not only that you should be comfortable with anonymous speech in such an environment, but that you should be suspicious of any speech that isn't.