Send this article to a friend:

April
24
2021

Gold & The Coming Oil Shortage – Part I
Tyler Durden

The oil price crash on the back of the COVID-19 lockdowns has accelerated the coming supply crunch. Both national and international oil companies have slashed CAPEX and maintenance spending, which will push up decline rates and US shale drillers finally focus on profitability instead of growth. Current longer-dated oil prices are too low to give enough incentive to oil companies to invest in badly needed future oil production. When they finally rise, gold prices will be pushed sharply higher.

In our gold price framework, we identified three main drivers for gold prices:

1. central bank policy (through real-interest rate expectations and QE),
   
   
2. changes in central bank inventories and
   
   
3. longer dated energy prices.

We found that these three drivers have a very high predicting value for gold prices over the past decades. When prices under- or overshoot the model predicted values, they tend to correct in the medium term. Current prices are well in line with the model-predicted prices (see Exhibit 1).

Exhibit 1: Our gold price model has been a great predictor for prices over the past decades ($/ozt)

Source: Goldmoney Research

We have discussed our outlook for the first driver at length in recent reports (see Gold price framework update – the new cycle accelerates, January 28, 2021, as well as The equity-gold price conundrum – Part I, March 8, 2021 and Part II, March 19, 2021.

Our outlook for the second driver – changes in central bank inventories – remains the same as it has been for the past years: Central Banks in emerging markets remain net buyers of gold, more than offsetting the still ongoing (but much slower) trend of Western central banks being net sellers. More importantly, and as we have highlighted before, central bank purchases have not been a strong contributor to gold prices for the past years, neither to the downside nor to the upside.

Exhibit 2: World reserve gold holdings (Ozt million)

Source: IMF, Goldmoney Research

Which brings us to the last driver of gold prices: Longer term energy prices. Longer term energy prices were the main contributor to the sharp gold rally between 2003-2008. The US shale revolution eventually led to a sharp repricing of the back end in 2014, which had a net negative impact for gold prices. However, since early 2016, longer term energy prices have barely moved.

Exhibit 3: Long-dated energy prices were the largest contributor to the gold price rally until 2008, they had a negative impact between 2009-2015, and no impact over the past five years ($/ozt)

Source: Goldmoney Research

It’s important to highlight that longer-dated oil prices today are not only almost unchanged versus five years ago, there was barely any volatility during the entire time period. Even when oil prices crashed in early 2020 on the back of the first wave of COVID-19 lockdowns, longer dated oil prices dipped only modestly and quickly recovered thereafter.

Exhibit 4: 5-year forward Brent prices ($/bbl (LHS))

Source: Goldmoney research

However, while the COVID-19 pandemic so far has had a very limited impact on long-dated oil prices, in our view, it will have a substantial impact on future supply growth. More specifically, we believe that sharp spending cuts have led to widespread underinvestment, which in turn has accelerated our expected supply crunch, leading to a dramatic shortfall in the medium to long term.

Oil markets during COVID-19 pandemic

In order to get a better understanding of how the past year has profoundly impacted the long term outlook for energy markets, it’s useful to look at what happened in terms of demand and supply during the COVID-19 crisis.

The global lockdowns lead to the most dramatic collapse in oil demand in history. At the peak (or better, at the bottom), global oil demand was down over 20 million b/d, or over 20%. To put this into historical perspective, at the low of the great financial crisis, when oil prices crashed from $150/bbl to $30/bbl, global oil demand was down just 3 million b/d.

Exhibit 5: The impact of the Covid lockdowns on global oil demand was unprecedented (Mb/d)

Source: Goldmoney Research

As a result, global inventories rose at the fastest pace and to the highest levels on record.

Exhibit 6: Global total petroleum stocks (Thousand barrels)

Source: Goldmoney Research

The result was that oil prices crashed. While global benchmarks like Brent decline by around 60% from peak to bottom ($68/bbl to $25/bbl, landlocked crudes such as WTI saw negative prices ($62/bbl to $-40/bbl).

Exhibit 7: Crude oil prices crashed at the beginning of the pandemic, signaling the need for drastic production adjustments ($/bbl)

Source: Bloomberg, Goldmoney Research

It became clear that drastic measures would be needed in order to prevent global prices from suffering the same fate. As a result, OPEC+ agreed on the largest production cuts in history, taking 10mb/d of production offline. This was further aided by a sharp contraction in US shale oil production, and to a much lesser extent by non-OPEC ex US supply.

Exhibit 8: The price crash in 2020 lead to an unprecedented supply response (Mb/d vs December 2019)

Source: Goldmoney Research

The important part for future production is that we make a clear distinction between those three supply sources (counting OPEC and the + states as one source). There are very different reasons for why production is down from each source and more importantly, what the long term prospects are.

In the second part of this report, we will discuss the prospects of each source in detail and show that the pandemic, and the ensuing price crash, have accelerate a process where global production will hardly be able to grow. At the same time, demand will not peak as quickly as people believe. This has the potential for a massive supply shortfall in the medium term.

 

our mission:

to widen the scope of financial, economic and political information available to the professional investing public.
to skeptically examine and, where necessary, attack the flaccid institution that financial journalism has become.
to liberate oppressed knowledge.
to provide analysis uninhibited by political constraint.
to facilitate information's unending quest for freedom.
our method: pseudonymous speech...
Anonymity is a shield from the tyranny of the majority. it thus exemplifies the purpose behind the bill of rights, and of the first amendment in particular: to protect unpopular individuals from retaliation-- and their ideas from suppression-- at the hand of an intolerant society.

...responsibly used.

The right to remain anonymous may be abused when it shields fraudulent conduct. but political speech by its nature will sometimes have unpalatable consequences, and, in general, our society accords greater weight to the value of free speech than to the dangers of its misuse.

Though often maligned (typically by those frustrated by an inability to engage in ad hominem attacks) anonymous speech has a long and storied history in the united states. used by the likes of mark twain (aka samuel langhorne clemens) to criticize common ignorance, and perhaps most famously by alexander hamilton, james madison and john jay (aka publius) to write the federalist papers, we think ourselves in good company in using one or another nom de plume. particularly in light of an emerging trend against vocalizing public dissent in the united states, we believe in the critical importance of anonymity and its role in dissident speech. like the economist magazine, we also believe that keeping authorship anonymous moves the focus of discussion to the content of speech and away from the speaker- as it should be. we believe not only that you should be comfortable with anonymous speech in such an environment, but that you should be suspicious of any speech that isn't.

 

www.zerohedge.com