Send this article to a friend:

February
08
2021

Proof That the US November Election Was Stolen Exists in Abundance
Paul Craig Roberts

The official narrative that there was no election theft is likely the largest lie ever perpetrated on the world.  The lie is so vast and so fragile that everyone who disagrees with the official narrative is suppressed, deplatformed, kicked off social media, ostracized, and fired from their job in order to protect the lie from examination and exposure.  In Michigan the state attorney general is attempting to debar attorneys who represented cases of electoral theft. Massive effort was made—including an orchestrated “storming of the Capitol”—to insure that the evidence would not be presented and that the majority of the population would never encounter the evidence.  The presstitutes from the first instance declared continuously with one voice “there was no vote fraud,” “baseless claims of vote fraud,” and the old standby “conspiracy theory.”

Obviously, if there was no fraud, there would have been no danger in examining “baseless claims.”  Their baselessness could simply have been demonstrated.  If the claims of electoral fraud are baseless, there was no need to spilt the country and to cause half of the voting population to distrust the public institutions that are supposed to uphold election integrity.

Even without hard evidence of a stolen election, it is obvious that Trump did not lose to Biden who inspired no enthusiasm and whose campaign events had to be halted due to non-attendance. How did Trump lose the election when on December 29, after two months of his heightened demonization following the November 2020 election, he won the annual Gallup survey as America’s most admired person, ending Obama’s 12-year run. According to the official vote count, Trump received 11 million more votes in 2020 than the number he won in 2016 and three times the black support. In 2020 Trump received 8 million more votes than Obama received in 2012 and Hillary received in 2016.  It is not possible that this extraordinary performance is a losing one.  And this is his official vote count, not his suppressed actual vote.

No sane person believes that such an uninspiring candidate as Biden garnered 81.2 million votes—15.3 million more popular votes than Obama in 2012 and Hillary in 2016.  The Obama-Hillary popular vote of 65 to 66 million is the limit of the Democrat vote. Even Trump’s losing official vote count of 74 million is larger than any winning president in American history other than the fraudulent 2020 Biden vote count.

In other words, no voting machine or other material evidence is needed to see that the 2020 election was stolen.

Nevertheless, there is massive evidence.  Giuliani collected a lot of it, and it was presented to members of state legislatures in swing states.  I watched presentations of the evidence by highly skilled analysts and sworn witnesses.  In previous postings on this website there are links to the presentations. As so much information has been deplatformed, the links might no longer work.  But “MyPillow” CEO Mike Lindell has collected some of the experts who investigated the electoral fraud and has put together a two-hour video that provides some of the massive evidence, certainly enough to liberate you from the media indoctrination “there is no evidence.”

Mike Lindell’s presentation is here:  https://michaeljlindell.com 

I recommend that you watch the entire video.  It will leave you wondering how such startling information could go unreported and be discarded in Orwell’s Memory Hole.  If you won’t find the time for the entire video, then go to Dr. Shiva’s presentation at about the 49 minute spot and to the presentation that begins about 1:08 by Matt DePerno, the lead attorney in the open Antrim County, Michigan, court case where Trump’s large vote was reported as Biden’s and Biden’s small vote was reported as Trump’s.  Then go to former Michigan state senator Partick Colbeck at 1:02, Melissa Carone at 1:04, and Russell Ramsland at about 23 minutes into the video.

I admire the partriotism and courage of Mike Lindell. By insisting on the truth, he is bringing all sorts of calumny upon himself, and many retailers are punishing him by dropping his company’s products.  I am concerned that the corrupt American Establishment will bankrupt him with endless lawsuits and false criminal indictments. In the United States law is no longer a shield of the people. It is a weapon to be wielded against people as it was in Stalinist Russia.

Although I recommend the video,  I think Mr. Lindell gets too involved in the presentations, interrupts the experts’ presentations with questions and points of his own and is too didactic.  I also think that Mr. Lindell’s belief is optimistic that the evidence will get a hearing and serve to reunite the country.  It is OK with me if Mr. Lindell is correct.  Indeed, I hope he is.  But the fact is that the election was stolen for a reason, and the Establishment is strong enough to protect the theft from the evidence and the truth.

As for the video itself, there seems to be two sets of contradictory evidence.  One set deals with computer algorithms and software in voting machines (not only Dominion’s) that can weight the vote count, for example, counting a vote for one candidate more than one and the other candidate’s vote less than one.  The machines can also be programmed to produce a large percentage of ballots that have to be adjudicated, that is assigned to a candidate by the discretion of election officials.  Testimony is provided in the video showing how both of these ways were used against Trump.

The other set of evidence has to do with foreign intervention in the election. A couple of experts establish beyond all doubt that despite assurances by Dominion and the media that the machines can’t be connected to the Internet, they most certainly can and were. We are even shown the Dominion manual instructions on how to connect the machines to the Internet.  

Once it is established that the machines can be connected to the Internet, foreign intervention becomes possible.  The final part of the video presents what appears to be  evidence of foreign intervention in the voting.  According to the evidence presented, equipment in many countries was used to alter the actual votes, with over 60% of the foreign intrusions coming from China.

So we are left with a question: Who stole the election?  The Democrats in the swing states using voting machines and mail-in ballots or China using the Internet to alter the vote count?

If China has its hooks into the Biden family, as the material on Hunter Biden’s laptop indicates, the Chinese government would have a strong interest in having a blackmailable president in the White House.  But why was voting machine manipulation necessary if the vote count can be altered via the Internet?  

Is the answer that both China and the Democrats were simultaneously stealing the election for Biden independently of one another or in cahoots?  Or does foreign intrusion mean  the use of foreign location or false foreign computer addresses to hide a local operation?

According to the foreign intrusion evidence, there was intrusion into the voting from other countries as well—Italy, Iran, Iraq, for example.  

If our election was actually stolen for Biden by foreign intrusion, why are Democrat election officials, the US media, and Dominion defending foreigners who defeated American democracy?

What I make of the evidence of foreign intrusion is that American conservatives and patriots much prefer to blame foreigners than  to point a finger at their own country.  It is easier for patriots to say “the foreigners did it” than to say “Americans did it.”  Moreover, the theft seems worse and becomes a national security issue if foreigners are to blame.

This comes through strongly in the video’s final words from a retired high-ranking US Air Force general who interprets the stolen election as the work of global socialists/communists who are subverting the United States.  This was also the theme of Sidney Powell, which I thought derailed to some extent the Giuliani investigation.

An election stolen by foreign intrusion is inconsistent with the video evidence of Democrat election officials counting the same ballots over and over, pulling out from under tables boxes of ballots that had never been folded or mailed and running them through the machines. It is inconsistent with the hundreds of sworn affidavits of those who witnessed fraud with mail-in ballots.  How did China bring all this about?  How did China know the graveyards that were voted, the out-of-state people who voted in swing states, the illegal aliens who voted, and so on? Did China also program the voting machines to weight the vote count in Biden’s favor?

If China stole the vote and Democrats did not, why are the Democrats so determined to protect themselves by preventing any examination of the evidence? Why, for example, is the Michigan attorney general trying to debar attorneys who bring election challenges against Michigan election officials, including an attorney who has an open court case in Michigan? Who owns Bill Barr and the Department of Justice?  China or the US Establishment?

The Democrats invented the accusation of foreign intervention in the 2016 election.  Russia’s alleged intervention was the basis for  three years of the Russiagate hoax.  It doesn’t seen productive to rival or negate such powerful evidence as presented by Dr. Shiva and the other investigators with a Chinagate story.  

Either Democrats used the voting machines to steal the election or China used the Internet to steal the election. The problem with Mr. Lindell’s video is that the video creates this contradiction and does not resolve it.  

Or so it seems to me.

Hon. Paul Craig Roberts is the John M. Olin Fellow at the Institute for Political Economy, Senior Research Fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University, and Research Fellow at the Independent Institute. A former editor and columnist for The Wall Street Journal and columnist for Business Week and the Scripps Howard News Service, he is a nationally syndicated columnist for Creators Syndicate in Los Angeles and a columnist for Investor's Business Daily. In 1992 he received the Warren Brookes Award for Excellence in Journalism. In 1993 the Forbes Media Guide ranked him as one of the top seven journalists.

He was Distinguished Fellow at the Cato Institute from 1993 to 1996. From 1982 through 1993, he held the William E. Simon Chair in Political Economy at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. During 1981-82 he served as Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy. President Reagan and Treasury Secretary Regan credited him with a major role in the Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981, and he was awarded the Treasury Department's Meritorious Service Award for "his outstanding contributions to the formulation of United States economic policy." From 1975 to 1978, Dr. Roberts served on the congressional staff where he drafted the Kemp-Roth bill and played a leading role in developing bipartisan support for a supply-side economic policy.

In 1987 the French government recognized him as "the artisan of a renewal in economic science and policy after half a century of state interventionism" and inducted him into the Legion of Honor.

Dr. Roberts' latest books are The Tyranny of Good Intentions, co-authored with IPE Fellow Lawrence Stratton, and published by Prima Publishing in May 2000, and Chile: Two Visions - The Allende-Pinochet Era, co-authored with IPE Fellow Karen Araujo, and published in Spanish by Universidad Nacional Andres Bello in Santiago, Chile, in November 2000. The Capitalist Revolution in Latin America, co-authored with IPE Fellow Karen LaFollette Araujo, was published by Oxford University Press in 1997. A Spanish language edition was published by Oxford in 1999. The New Colorline: How Quotas and Privilege Destroy Democracy, co-authored with Lawrence Stratton, was published by Regnery in 1995. A paperback edition was published in 1997. Meltdown: Inside the Soviet Economy, co-authored with Karen LaFollette, was published by the Cato Institute in 1990. Harvard University Press published his book, The Supply-Side Revolution, in 1984. Widely reviewed and favorably received, the book was praised by Forbes as "a timely masterpiece that will have real impact on economic thinking in the years ahead." Dr. Roberts is the author of Alienation and the Soviet Economy, published in 1971 and republished in 1990. He is the author of Marx's Theory of Exchange, Alienation and Crisis, published in 1973 and republished in 1983. A Spanish language edition was published in 1974.

Dr. Roberts has held numerous academic appointments. He has contributed chapters to numerous books and has published many articles in journals of scholarship, including the Journal of Political Economy, Oxford Economic Papers, Journal of Law and Economics, Studies in Banking and Finance, Journal of Monetary Economics, Public Finance Quarterly, Public Choice, Classica et Mediaevalia, Ethics, Slavic Review, Soviet Studies, Rivista de Political Economica, and Zeitschrift fur Wirtschafspolitik. He has entries in the McGraw-Hill Encyclopedia of Economics and the New Palgrave Dictionary of Money and Finance. He has contributed to Commentary, The Public Interest, The National Interest, Harper's, the New York Times, The Washington Post, The Los Angeles Times, Fortune, London Times, The Financial Times, TLS, The Spectator, Il Sole 24 Ore, Le Figaro, Liberation, and the Nihon Keizai Shimbun. He has testified before committees of Congress on 30 occasions.

Dr. Roberts was educated at the Georgia Institute of Technology (B.S.), the University of Virginia (Ph.D.), the University of California at Berkeley and Oxford University where he was a member of Merton College.

He is listed in Who's Who in America, Who's Who in the World, The Dictionary of International Biography, Outstanding People of the Twentieth Century, and 1000 Leaders of World Influence. His latest book, HOW THE ECONOMY WAS LOST, has just been published by CounterPunch/AK Press. He can be reached at: [email protected]

Please Donate

I listen to my readers. In March 2010, I terminated my syndicated column. Thousands of you protested. So persuasive were your emails asking me to reconsider and to continue writing that, two months later, I began writing again.

In order to create a coherent uncensored and unedited archive of my writings, The Institute For Political Economy, a non-profit organization that supports research, writing and books, has established this site, thus gratifying readers' demands that I continue to provide analyses of events in our time.

In order to stay up, this site needs to pay for itself.

www.paulcraigroberts.org