Do you Really Believe President Bush has ceded Decisions
on What He Has Characterized "National Defense" to the United Nations Security Council?
Why a Coalition?
by James Sinclair

First, understand that the US is not seeking a coalition to obtain permission by a world body to attack Iraq. That decision has already been made. The Administration is attempting to find others to partner the costs of war and rebuilding after the war with. They do not want help with fighting the war, they want help in fronting the bill for rebuilding Iraq as a modern society to be incubated into a pluralist society with a open election among competing interest.

A coalition was one of the reasons that gold failed after the last Iraq war. There was no rebuilding plan. We did not remove Saddam Hussein, therefore, in a sense we lost the opportunity purpose of the war and the shared reasonable costs.

We are going to war with Iraq. I will address the why as it is seen from within the Administration later in this editorial. If we go in, as it now appears, without a coalition, gold will vault above $400, then react slight under $400, and then begin a climb above $500. The reason why this will occur is the effect on the dollar from the US’s "no collation campaign" that will be won quickly as we have hoards of new high tech weapons that will make this war look more like science fiction than traditional battlefield warfare. Robots are ready to go block to block in Baghdad. Model aircraft will fly out of backpacks and carry a wallop. Smart artillery should now be considered Mensa projectiles. Winning the war will take only as long as the new MIT type machines of war need testing. The cost of the entire campaign waged and paid for by the US is what will take gold from a reaction well above Friday's gold close as the worst nightmare of the vocally confident hedgers and the cartel of common interest gold banks.

I am not arguing whether or not we should go to war, that is not my business in serving you. I am your financial "WATCHMAN", not your Guru, so here it is. You only need listen carefully to President Bush's words without your emotions of how you feel about the war situation. You cannot hear him clearly if you are thinking about your feelings towards what is being said. He has clearly said that 9/11 was an act of war on the US has resulted in a state of War existing. He has vowed to act against those that support those forces that have attacked the US as certain as the attack was on Pearl Harbor. Al Queda may be the popular name but this Administration sees no division between the intentions already exercised by one group from another with the same intentions awaiting only the opportunity. While all the attention of the masses is on Iraq, North Korea feels immune to an armed reaction from the USA but may well be walking a worse path if Kissenger fails to make a deal they cannot walk away from. The problem is they want too much AND with China And Russia supporting North Korea, Bush may have to be pretend to fear then and then nuke them before they nuke the West Coast of the USA. North Korea is the most significant problem but if Bush goes against all odds against Iraq, North Korea will make great noise but start shaking. That is from the inside. Therefore the chances of waking up to a war in Iraq any day, as Gen. Powell said, soon is more likely than not.

*Note this: "No coalition" does not mean "no war." It means that when the war starts this week or next, Gold will go above $400 then react slightly under it and then start a move toward and above $500 because. It means a Current Account US dollar deficit which will likely grow to 6% of GDP over the next six years. The dollar will do its war thing, fall. It will rally and then drop out of sight on the downside as the titanic financial implication are known to currency traders even if this gold community is clueless.Why this War?We know exactly what weapons we want evidence of their disposal. No such evidence has been produced. Again listen carefully to General Powell's words. Our so-called allies know exactly what he is talking about but we will do their work at no cost to them, so why sign on. The following is the reason the Administration is insistent on fighting THIS war:Toward the end of the former Soviet Union, the KGB initiated a campaign of starting many legitimate businesses as cover fronts for intelligence activities, both political as well as corporate espionage. It is alleged by knowledgeable people, such as the former CIA Director John Deutch, who said, on the record, that a company by the name of the Nordex Corporation in Vienna was "an organization associated with Russian criminal activities." It has been reported that as far back as 1993, after an embarrassment of receiving a large donation apparently from the then president of Nordex's cover man, Mr. Domb, who had introduced the president of the Nordex Corporation to the president and was photographed with the Nordex president donated $313,000 to the political party. At the same time, there were reported intercepts by the National Security

Agency concerning the Nordex Corporation and out of Pullach, the headquarters of German intelligence service. The following allegation appears in print and in public domain, "They're involved in arms, drugs, the whole nine years. They deal in strategic materials including plutonium and beryllium and uranium. They have as clients both Saddam Hussein and North Korea." The president of this company, which has been described by some "As the most dangerous man in the world," maintains his innocence having not been convicted of any crime.
Please understand that I do not have first hand knowledge of this but am reporting to you what has already been reported in print. Vienna has been the center of trade for items that came, and are in some cases still coming, out of the former Soviet Union. There is more intelligence in the business world just for the listening than in any popular spy novel. Knowing markets alone in the minor metals and material businesses can scare you half to death. Markets tell stories about bombing building and preparation for war long before they are heard publicly. I owned a minor metal and strategic metals trading houses and have authored a book on it myself. Atomic secrets stand right in front of you and yell at you who is doing what with whom.

Nuclear devices have been bought and sold since the fall of the old Soviet Union. In 1996 General Alexander Lebed was secretary of Yelsin's National Security Council. He therefore had access to all the secrets. He ordered an inventory of all the suitcase sized nuclear devises manufactured and stored in the Soviet Union. The inventory reported a total of 132 manufactured devises but according to records only 48 can be located and 84 are missing. This is reported in print as a remark made to a group of visitors by General Lebed. He was quoted as saying that they were low yield bombs in the area of only a few kilotons but would make "a decent boom."
I could go on and on but again, we know what weapons we wish to see convincing evidence that they no longer exist. It has been tracked through the transaction to the final buyers. Our so-called allies know this but why sign on a collation if you know for sure that the US will do your work for you at no cost to you.

Further suggested reading:

1. "Clinton's Shady Messenger" The Washington Times, March 1st, 1997
2. " The Russian Connection" Time Magazine, July 8th, 1996
3. " The Russian Connection" U.S. News & World Report," October 23rd, 1995
4. "Russian trader is a mystery man" Central European Economic Review, March issue 1995
5. Hannes Reichmann of Wirstchaftwoche & Profil magazine
6. "One Point Safe, A True Story" by Andrew and Leslie Cockburn published by Anchor Books/ Doubleday (out of print)

Conclusion: Where gold is concerned, as soon as this extreme angle power down trend breaks we are on our way to a $3.2 trillion dollar deficit and gold over $400 then $500 in the mode of progression outlined to you.Associated Press:BAGHDAD, Iraq (Feb. 16) - Iraq on Sunday gloated over the global outpouring of opposition to the U.S. threat of attack, saying anti-war demonstrations in dozens of countries signaled an Iraqi victory and ``the defeat and isolation of America.''

U.N. weapons inspectors, meanwhile, were back hunting for weapons of mass destruction Sunday, paying surprise visits to at least 10 suspect sites, including food factories, an air base in the northern city of Mosul and a science college.

Iraq's tightly controlled news media gave prominent coverage to anti-war demonstrations staged around the world on Saturday. Iraqi television showed footage of millions marching in the world's cities - under the logo ``International Day of Confronting the Aggression.''

``The world said with one voice: 'No to aggression on Iraq,''' read a headline in the government daily Al-Jumhuriya. ``The world rises against American aggression and the arrogance of naked force,'' read a front page headline in the army daily Al-Qadissiya.
Dear Mr. Hussein:

Do not rest easy in your assumed "Defeat and Isolation of America"; it is only our dear friends who want us to do their work for them at no cost to them. They know exactly what we want and they want that to, but only for free.

The weakness of the western society is the dedication of the leadership for political reasons to never allow the "social order" to become confused and destabilized by the real facts. The real reason for this will be given to them if required. Much of the intelligence written about here is from the German, French, as well as British services as well as being in public domain. Watch the sky as Mr. Bush will have an answer for you soon.
Regards,

J SinclairWASHINGTON (Feb. 16) - President Bush's national security adviser admonished the United Nations on Sunday to stand up to Saddam Hussein, while hedging on whether the White House was ready to go back to the U.N. to seek its support.

Condoleezza Rice said the urgency to disarm the Iraqi president had not diminished despite mounting opposition in the U.N. Security Council to a military strike.

``Continuing to talk about more time and more time and more time is simply going to relieve pressures on the Iraqis to do what they must do,'' Rice said on NBC's ``Meet The Press.'' ``It is time for this to end, enough is enough. Putting this off is not an option.''