Send this article to a friend: November |
Time To End This Scam-demic: "Pandemic Is Over" I decided for a change to actually turn on the '6 o'clock news' just to see what garbage that propaganda bullshit 'news media' service had to say today here in Manitoba, especially in light of their screaming about these '546' new cases of INFLUENZA over the last 24 hours that does indeed inflate their fraud 'numbers' to generate fear in Manitobans, and I was not disappointed... They were harping again and again the false notion that this 'scam-demic' is somehow 'out of control' and using the lying 'numbers' as their excuse for that fraud.... It has been so remarkable to watch these fuckers make their statements with such straight faces, and it shows definitely that the 'media' can never be trusted and that they are fully in bed with the criminals running this entire scam.. Therefore when this madness does end, I want to see everyone show no mercy for the lying media whores as well as our crooked and criminal government officials for this scam! Well.. I was sent the link to the following very important article that comes from the "Tap News Wire" online news service at www.tapnewswire.com, and the person that sent it to me requested I post it up at this blog... I read the article he sent, and I knew right away that it definitely belonged here for all of my own readers as well...This article is entitled:"Pandemic Is Over - Former Pfizer Chief Science Officer Says "Second Waver: Faked On False-Positive Tests" and I do have it right here for everyone to read for themselves, for it definitely rips apart all notions of this 'second wave' being somehow real... Here is that article, and of course my own thoughts and comments to follow: ER Editor: We’re linking to a piece we published on April 1, 2020, which brings us full circle, with a boatload of experts back then questioning the virus hype: TWENTY-TWO Experts Questioning the Coronavirus Panic [VIDEOS & Scientific Common Sense]. And this from March 30 by the esteemed Dr. Peter Goetzsche of the Cochrane Institute: Coronavirus: An Epidemic of Mass Panic. March was the time of the greatest number of infections, with the greatest number of deaths following on in April. Data experts said we locked down during March when it was already evident that the number of infections were about to decline. As Goetsche said back then, ‘it’s a dream scenario for those with dictatorship tendencies.’
This video provides one of the most erudite and informative looks at Covid-19 and the consequences of lockdowns. As AIER notes, it was remarkable this week to watch as it appeared on YouTube and was forcibly taken down only 2 hours after posting. The copy below is hosted on LBRY, a blockchain video application. In a year of fantastic educational content, this is one of the best we’ve seen. Consider the presenter’s bio:
What likely triggered the Silicon Valley censor-mongers is the fact that a former Chief Science Officer for the pharmaceutical giant Pfizer says “there is no science to suggest a second wave should happen.” The “Big Pharma” insider asserts that false positive results from inherently unreliable COVID tests are being used to manufacture a “second wave” based on “new cases.” As Ralph Lopez write at HubPages, Yeadon warns that half or even “almost all” of tests for COVID are false positives. Dr. Yeadon also argues that the threshold for herd immunity may be much lower than previously thought, and may have been reached in many countries already. In an interview last week (see below) Dr. Yeadon was asked:
Dr. Yeadon answered with a simple “yes.” Even more significantly, even if all positives were to be correct, Dr. Yeadon said that given the “shape” of all important indicators in a worldwide pandemic, such as hospitalizations, ICU utilization, and deaths, “the pandemic is fundamentally over.” Yeadon said in the interview:
In a paper published this month, which was co-authored by Yeadon and two of his colleagues, “How Likely is a Second Wave?”, the scientists write:
In the data for UK, Sweden, the US, and the world, it can be seen that in all cases, deaths were on the rise in March through mid or late April, then began tapering off in a smooth slope which flattened around the end of June and continues to today. The case rates however, based on testing, rise and swing upwards and downwards wildly. Media messaging in the US is already ramping up expectations of a “second wave.” The survival rate of COVID-19 has been upgraded since May to 99.8% of infections. This comes close to ordinary flu, the survival rate of which is 99.9%. Although COVID can have serious after-effects, so can flu or any respiratory illness. The present survival rate is far higher than initial grim guesses in March and April, cited by Dr. Anthony Fauci, of 94%, or 20 to 30 times deadlier. The Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) value accepted by Yeadon et al in the paper is .26%. The survival rate of a disease is 100% minus the IFR. Dr. Yeadon pointed out that the “novel” COVID-19 contagion is novel only in the sense that it is a new type of coronavirus. But, he said, there are presently four strains which circulate freely throughout the population, most often linked to the common cold. In the scientific paper, Yeadon et al write:
The scientists argue that much of the population already has, if not antibodies to COVID, some level of “T-cell” immunity from exposure to other related coronaviruses, which have been circulating long before COVID-19. The scientists write:
Introducing the idea that some prior immunity to COVID-19 already existed, the authors of “How Likely is a Second Wave?” write:
They go on to say that, because of this prior resistance, only 15-25% of a population being infected may be sufficient to reach herd immunity:
In the US, accepting a death toll of 200,000, and a survival rate of 99.8%, this would mean for every person who has died, there would be about 400 people who had been infected, and lived. This would translate to around 80 million Americans, or 27% of the population. This touches Yeadon’s and his colleagues’ threshold for herd immunity. Finally, the former Pfizer executive and scientist singles out one former colleague for withering rebuke for his role in the pandemic, Professor Neil Ferguson (pictured). Ferguson taught at Imperial College while Yeadon was affiliated. Ferguson’s computer model provided the rationale for governments to launch draconian orders which turned free societies into virtual prisons overnight. Over what is now estimated by the CDC to be a 99.8% survival rate virus. Dr. Yeadon said in the interview that “no serious scientist gives any validity” to Ferguson’s model. Speaking with thinly-veiled contempt for Ferguson, Dr. Yeadon took special pains to point out to his interviewer:
Yeadon joins other scientists in castigating governments for following Ferguson’s model, the assumptions of which all worldwide lockdowns are based on. One of these scientists is Dr. Johan Giesecke, former chief scientist for the European Center for Disease Control and Prevention, who called Ferguson’s model “the most influential scientific paper” in memory, and also “one of the most wrong.” It was Ferguson’s model which held that “mitigation” measures were necessary, i.e. social distancing and business closures, in order to prevent, for example, over 2.2 million people dying from COVID in the US. Ferguson predicted that Sweden would pay a terrible price for no lockdown, with 40,000 COVID deaths by May 1, and 100,000 by June. Sweden’s death count is under 6,000. The Swedish government says this corresponds to a mild flu season. Although initially higher, Sweden now has a lower death rate per-capita than the US, which it achieved without the terrific economic damage still ongoing in the US. Sweden never closed restaurants, bars, sports, most schools, or movie theaters. The government never ordered people to wear masks. Dr. Yeadon speaks bitterly of the lives lost as a result of lockdown policies, and of the “saveable” countless lives which will be further lost, from important surgeries and other healthcare deferred, should lockdowns be reimposed.Watch the full discussion below:
Yeadon’s warnings are confirmed by a new study from the Infectious Diseases Society of America., summarized succinctly in the following twitter thread from al gato malo (@boriquagato) Anyone still presuming that a Positive PCR test is showing a COVID case needs to read this very carefully:
A lot of people still seem to not understand what this means, so let’s lay that out for a minute. PCR tests look for RNA. There is too little in your swab, so they amplify it using a primer-based heating and annealing process. Each cycle of this process doubles the material The US (and much of the world) is using a 40 Ct (cycle threshold). So, 40 doublings, 1 trillion X amplification. This is absurdly high. The way that we know this is by running this test, seeing the Ct to find the RNA, and then using the same sample to try to culture virus. If you cannot culture the virus, then the virus is “dead.” It’s inert. If it cannot replicate, it cannot infect you or others. It’s just traces of virus, remnants, fragments, etc. PCR is not testing for disease, it’s testing for a specific RNA pattern and this is the key pivot. When you crank it up to 25, 70% of the positive results are not really “positives” in any clinical sense. I hesitate to call it a “false positive” because it’s really not. It did find RNA, but that RNA is not clinically relevant. It cannot make you or anyone else sick So let’s call this a non-clinical positive (NCP).
No one can culture live virus past about 34 and we have known this since March. yet no one has adjusted these tests. This is more very strong data refuting the idea that you can trust a PCR+ as a clinical indicator. That is NOT what it’s meant for. At all. Using them to do real time epidemiology is absurd. The FDA would never do it, the drug companies doing vaccine trials would never do it… it’s because it’s nonsense. And this same test is used for “hospitalizations” and “death with covid” (itself a weirdly over inclusive metric) PCR testing is not the answer, it’s the problem. It’s not how to get control of an epidemic, it’s how to completely lose control of your data picture and wind up with gibberish and we have done this to ourselves before. A quick word what this data does and does not mean.Saying “a sample requiring 35 Ct to test + has a 3% real clinical positive rate” does not mean “97% of + tests run at 35 Ct are NCP’s” People seem to get confused on this, so let’s explain: Most tests are just amplified and run. They don’t test every cycle as these academics do. That would make the test slow and expensive, so you just run 40 cycles then test. Obviously, a real clinical positive (RCP) that would have been + at 20 is still + at 40. But when you run the tests each cycle as the academics do, that test would already have dropped out. So saying that only 3% at 35 are RCP really means that 3% of those samples not PCR + at 34 were PCR and RCP + at 35. This lets us infer little about overall NCP/RCP rate. So we cannot say “at 25 Ct, we have a 70 NCP rate.” In fact, it’s hard to say much of anything. It depends entirely on what the source material coming in looks like. You cannot even compare like to like. This is what i mean by “the data is gibberish” Today at 40 Ct, 7% PCR positive rate could be 1% RCP prevalence when that same thing meant 6% RCP prev in april. If there is lots more trace virus around, more people who have recovered and have fragments left over, etc, this test could be finding virus you killed 4 months ago. So if we consider RCP rate/PCR+ rate, we would expect that number to drop sharply late in an epidemic because there is more dead virus around for PCR to find, but we have no idea what that ratio is or how it changes. This spills over in to deaths, reported hospitalization, etc. Testing is being made out to be like the high beams on a car, but when it’s snowing like hell at night, that is the LAST thing you want. It is not illuminating our way, it’s blinding us. A bad inaccurate map is much worse than no map at all, and this is a world class bad map… We’re basing policy that is affecting billions of humans on data that is uninterpretable gibberish. It’s a deranged technocrat’s wet dream, but for those of us along for the ride, it’s a nightmare. Testing is not the solution, it’s the problem.Any technocrat or scientist that does not know this by now is either unfit for their job or has decided that they just don’t care and prefer power to morality. This is, of course, precisely the kind of person who winds up running a gov’t agency… oopsie. The head of the NIH is not the best scientist, it’s the best politician. All this wild and reckless government policy has never been about the science. It’s politics and panic. NTS Notes: I too have noticed how the pricks behind "Youtube" which properly should be called "Screw You Tube" have indeed been censoring this Doctor Mike Yeadon... For he has indeed been coming out showing that we are so intensely lied to about this entire scam-demic and he presents the proof that it is and always has been a massive scam... And do not get me started about the fraudulence of the "RT-PCR test" or just "PCR test" for short.... That test and its exclusive false positive results is WHY the fuckers even here in Manitoba can claim "546" new cases, as ALL of those test results were from that stupid 100% inaccurate test! I am not shocked at all by the allegations and facts presented in this article, for I have said for months now that they would attempt a 'second wave' of this fraud 'deadly virus' and yes they are basing that entire fraud on the fact that we are now deep into INFLUENZA SEASON and are counting ALL of those who are suffering from that REAL disease as this fraud "COVID-19" instead... So where do we go from here? I say we should be getting this information out to EVERYONE and once again try to wake them all the fuck up.... Many are indeed too far gone by now thanks to the brainwashing propaganda coupled with them wearing brain damaging face masks, but there are still sane and rational people out there that can be hopefully reached... Please take this article, like so many others that I have posted here at this blog, and give them out FREELY to everyone... I have said that I do not give a damn if you give credit to me or not, for I just want to see people wake up from their slumber and end this fraud scam-demic once and for all..
|
Send this article to a friend: