Quantcast

 

 

 

 
 

Verleger Sees $20 Oil This Year on 'Devastating' Glut
Grant Smith

(Editor's Note: Take this report with a grain of salt. Yes, I believe that there is a "tempory glut" developing. I also believe that it is a result of the massive imbalances that have been put in place by the speculative excesses of the criminals on Wall Street over the last year and a half. Unlike most postings, we included a comment from one of our favorite pundits , Jim Kunstler, at the end of this article. His thoughts coincide with ours. Yes, oil may drop to $20 a barrell in the short run, but within eighteen months, it will be more expensive that ever before, IMHO. Quite an opportunity for the savvy investor. - JSB)

July 16 (Bloomberg) -- Crude oil will collapse to $20 a barrel this year as the recession takes a deeper toll on fuel demand, according to academic and former U.S. government adviser Philip Verleger.

A crude surplus of 100 million barrels will accumulate by the end of the year, straining global storage capacity and sending prices to a seven-year low, said Verleger, who correctly predicted in 2007 that prices were set to exceed $100. Supply is outpacing demand by about 1 million barrels a day, he said.

"The economic situation is not getting better," Verleger, 64, a professor at the University of Calgary and head of consultant PKVerleger LLC, said in a telephone interview yesterday. "Global refinery runs are going to be much lower in the fall. If the recession continues and it's a warm winter, it's going to be devastating."

Crude oil last traded at $20 a barrel in February 2002. Futures were at $61.18 today in New York, having recovered 89 percent from a four-year low reached last December. The Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries is implementing record supply cuts announced last year in response to plunging consumption.

"OPEC don't realize the magnitude of the cuts they need to make," which would total about a further 2 million barrels a day, Verleger added. "Storage is going to become tight. It's not clear if there's going to be enough storage available."

China, Inflation

Oil will average $63.91 in the fourth quarter, according to the median of analyst forecasts compiled by Bloomberg. Crude for December delivery traded at $65.61 today in New York. Prices have rebounded on expectations of a demand recovery, led by China and other developing economies, and concern expansionary monetary policy would stoke inflation and weaken the dollar.

At the other end of the spectrum from Verleger, Goldman Sachs Group Inc. predicted in a report yesterday oil will rally to $85 a barrel by the end of the year, and recommended that clients buy futures contracts for delivery in December 2011.

"China is in a real desperate situation," said Verleger, who publishes the Petroleum Economics Monthly. "We're in a situation where U.S. consumers aren't consuming and Chinese manufacturers get hurt. Economists are looking for growth in all the wrong places."

Forward contracts for oil have been higher than prices for immediate delivery this year, a situation known as contango, creating incentives to buy crude now and store it. That may end as growing stockpiles make storage more expensive.

"Prices would be much lower today, but for the very large incentive to build inventories," Verleger said. "You need forward buyers, which we had when people were fearing inflation, but as concerns turn toward deflation" that will no longer be the case.

James Howard Kunstler's response to this article:

Extreme volitility in price will be an ongoing feature of Peak Oil economics. Global oil production has maxed out at roughly 85-million barrels a day. Demand has been running 83 - 84 million. Today's demand destruction will soon translate into tomorrow's supply destruction as low prices destroy capital investment in new oil projects. These were the projects designed to offset future depletions, and now they are being cancelled. It is already happening and it will get worse if prices fall further. The "snapback" from this will be severe as depletions continue apace and exporting nations use more and more of their own oil. Thus, Verleger's view is short-sighted to the extreme, and nobody should take it as a sign that the Peak Oil problem is behind us.

To contact the reporters on this story: Grant Smith in London at gsmith52@bloomberg.net

www.bloomberg.com


Send this article to a friend:

 


Back to Top